A renal transplant patient with a history of numerous squamous cell carcinomas (SCCs) presents to you with a growing lesion on the left forearm. It measures 1.5 cm and is quite tender. On histopathology there is a well-differentiated cutaneous (cSCC) measuring 1.8 mm in Breslow depth. No other characteristics of the tumor are commented on in the pathology report. Would micrographic dermatologic surgery (Mohs) be considered appropriate and generally accepted in this scenario based on the published Mohs appropriate use criteria (AUC)?
In an immunosuppressed patient, any non-aggressive form of cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma (cSCC) greater than 1.0 cm in size meets criteria for Mohs surgery based on Mohs appropriate use criteria (AUC) regardless of location (Connolly et al. JAAD 2012). In this case, a score of 7/9 is generated based on the following criteria:
Appropriate Use Criteria for micrographic dermatologic surgery (Mohs):
Mask areas of the face (central face, eyelids, eyebrows, nose, lips, chin, ears, periauricular, temple, genitalia, perineal, perianal, hands, feet, nails, ankles, nipples)
Appropriate (score of 7-9)
Inappropriate
Cheeks, forehead, scalp, neck, jawline, pretibial surface
Appropriate
Inappropriate
Trunk and extremities (excludes pretibial, hands, feet, nails, ankles)
Appropriate
Uncertain
Inappropriate
Clinical Pearl: National Societies, including the American Academy of Dermatology, American Society of Dermatologic Surgery, American College of Mohs Surgery, and NCCN Guidelines, have published data that guide appropriate selection of cutaneous malignancies for treatment with micrographic dermatologic surgery (Mohs). Immunosuppression status plays a big role in Mohs AUC for determination of appropriateness of Mohs surgery for treatment of squamous cell carcinoma.